wow cartographe bc downloaded

4 deuils, Faustus to them with this speech,"--wrongly.] [Footnote 28: her: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "his."] [Footnote 29: erring: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "euening."] [Footnote 30: Mephistophilis Dragon, quod tumeraris: See note *, p. 83. Note *, from p. 83. (Doctor Faustus, from the quarto of 1604): "surgat Mephistophilis, quod tumeraris: The later 4tos have "surgat Mephistophilis DRAGON, quod tumeraris."--There is a corruption here, which seems to defy emendation. For "quod TUMERARIS," Mr. J. Crossley, of Manchester, would read (rejecting the word "Dragon") "quod TU MANDARES" (the construction being "quod tu mandares ut Mephistophilis appareat et surgat"): but the "tu" does not agree with the preceding "vos."--The Revd. J. Mitford proposes "surgat Mephistophilis, per Dragon (or Dagon) quod NUMEN EST AERIS."" ] [Footnote 31: dicatus: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "dicatis."] [Footnote 32: came hither: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "came NOW hether."] [Footnote 33: speeches: So 4to 1604.--Not in the later 4tos.] [Footnote 34: accidens: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "accident."] [Footnote 35: fell: So 4to 1604.--The later 4tos "liue."] [Footnote 36: strike: So 4to 1631.--2tos 1616, 1624, "strikes."] [Footnote 37: thorough: So 4to 1631.--2tos 1616, 1624, "through."] [Footnote 38: Sirrah: So 4to 1616.--Not in 4tos 1624, 1631.] [Footnote 39: save: So 4tos 1616, 1624.--2to 1631 "spare."] [Footnote 40: again: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--Not in 4to 1616.] [Footnote 41: or: Old eds. "for."] [Footnote 42: vestigiis nostris: Old eds. "vestigias nostras."] [Footnote 43: backward: So 4to 1616 (and so 4to 1604).--2tos 1624, 1631,